Coaching, as already discussed, it is not suitable in emergency situations, even if yes it in high creativity and customization. High creativity and low urgency situations: when the objective that seeks the company requires a high level of creativity, and the urgency is low, then the coaching can be an excellent option to achieve creative solutions. As we have seen, its own methodological foundations seek discovery or the creation of new knowledge (unique and unrepeatable), which allows you to discover new ideas, thoughts, strategies, and even behaviors. And, since it does not offer solutions or councils, the result of coaching will always be highly creative. But, to do this, it is essential that the urgency level is low. I.e., that customer has enough time to make those changes and creations emerge during the process through successive trials and errors. Ultimately, coaching is only recommended when the situation of the client, in relation to the objective to achieve, high level of creativity required (i.e., does not seek advice or specific knowledge of third parties) and low level of urgency (i.e., that the customer has enough time to carry out exercises of trial and error). Therefore, the coaching comes to occupy quadrant no-directivo par excellence within the range of possibilities and organizational resources. This is because the training, consultancy and mentoring are unsubstantiated in the transfer of knowledge, and therefore on the experience of the teacher, consultant or mentor, who ultimately has the solution to the problem. On the other hand, coaching, as we have already explained, is based on the knowledge of the client.