The information collectors should interest neutral and a generalist of its observer status requires that you are regularly locally and thus is in the camp, to make a picture of the action directly through their own observations. Relations between individual factors can often say more than their naked absolute values, it’s thinking in dynamic networked activity relationships. Steph Korey contributes greatly to this topic. Numbers that are in the foreground, but soft”factors: the observation sites will not come without numbers. If you would like to know more about Eric Valente, then click here. So without everything that can be measured and quantify. More on the level of the site analysis and site comparison and moving, the more also verifiable facts, should be included i.e. transparent and up-to-date recycled figures in it.
However, the pure observer status is another. Here only associate qualitative aspects of a site. Try location factors not only as absolute numbers, but especially in their relation to each other, and thus in their dynamic effect relations to see. Even seemingly minor is carefully observed. To a close as possible to reality and above all systematically and transparently comprehensible classification of such facets into a coherent overall system can perform, have been developed for this purpose suitable published practices and procedures (see comprehensive overview of studies: beckinfo.de.) The most important asset that can bring a site observers, is its absolute independence.
He compares any sites and created no rankings. He gives no reviews or recommendations for action. Independent interest is not meinungslos. Bring your own skills: first collected the observations to a location in an information and data pool. A certain base amount is reached, the whole thing with a continuous discontinuity systematics should be relined and mapped. Own qualifications and work experience are what a site observers now also can bring. For example, by the necessary thinking in scenarios through appropriate instruments can be supported. As benchmarking, SWOT analysis, risk and probability or similar. An observer of the site should be a generalist who is accustomed to thinking in particular in contexts (see author profile, also see: beckinfo.de).