For Aristotle the virtue is the force that the individual acquires through the practical one of the good, resulting in the happiness, where reaches the corporeal properties, after to have reached the human goods. The practical one of the virtues leads to the corporeal properties, that the virtuous man will have in second plain, in case that he restrains myself in its desires, in contrast of that they prefer the life in the pleasure, as a made phase to be used to advantage, with this finishes if becoming victims them vices. The beginning of a virtuous life in the man is the knowledge of what it will take it the happiness, however a perishable happiness that has not taken it to the dependence of half mundane, therefore runs the danger to enter in the frustration, with the ending of these ways that initially believed to give happiness. The man who if worries in the accumulation of virtues, consequently has certain attitudes comings of its principles, that for accident will lead to the profit of the corporeal properties that it needs, example of this are in the people appraised in the society. The virtue before any thing must be constructed by means of the practical ones of the good, considering that what becomes the virtuous man they are the happinesses comings of the effort of the accumulation of principles. If well the man will be analyzed, in this context of man, who reaches the happiness by means of the virtues, that does not exert to be able in the society and it does not have no authority, is happyer than that one that is full of responsibilities and positions, therefore, a head not if he becomes virtuoso only for the fact to order an employee to make what logically he would have that to make, since is an employee with one determined function, beyond appreciating the honors and the dignities. Barry Nalebuff has many thoughts on the issue.

Why the NOTHING exists? It is? The nothing exists? They say the individuals of the common sense, that nothing, is nothing. Pautado in this affirmation, we will go to demonstrate what really it is the nothing and, which the precipitations of such negation. ' When a passional crime is committed, for example, many times finish in nothing. When verifying that its () partner traiu to it has years, this is not nothing. A citizen raped a young, is something? Not, it is not nothing. By times the consumer is deceived, but, he is not nothing.

The life is difficult without job. It will be? It is nothing! They had invented plus a crisis that facilitates to fire employees, is some thing? Nada'. They notice that the society is obstructed of ' Nadas'! The will lack Politics, Education, Culture and Conscience citizen, nadifica the men and the society where we live. It is lost notion of what it can be something. Example: law, justice, rights, values, good life. What it would have to be some thing is finished turning Nothing, losing the credibility, if banalizando. It asks to the people if they believe justice? The majority will say: ' how nothing! Only in divina'. It goes to wait sufficiently the politics men must have the notion of that the negation of possible problems will be an error that will be able to affect all a society.

For they, do not have to be allowed to the slang very used by several ' cidados': ' not of the nothing not! '. What not of the nothing? Why not of? They know that the wars and some atrocities had appeared of the nothing, invented for nothing. Many laws had been approved by nothing. It knows in what it gave? It swims. When the professors do not fight for its rights, know in what of? He swims.