And all these friends – its potential clients, so these actions you are likely never seen, and do not see it. Writing Board considered above the girl that she understood everything and had taken into account, not offended – it is a science. Photographer must be a psychologist and marketing. But first and foremost, he still has to be a photographer. If you do not stick out your nose on your page – you'll never get exactly progress. Where does one show off their creations? In the Vladimir region, there is only one full-length photo resource. This site fotonostra.ru. In fact, this photo gallery with the possibility of discussion.
What is notable this site? He is very fast, users Trek, as there is not considered traffic, the lack of stringent requirements for size photos No spam, and generally a pleasure to work with the site. If at most sites, photo resolution is limited outside 900h600 pixels and file size of 250-300 kb, then there 2000h1000 pixels and 700 KB. Although I still recommend to spread photos standard format for Internet 900h600 pixels, so as viewing audiences large frames may limit their monitors. Roughly speaking, the picture just is not fully fit in the monitor. There are no limitations and number of photos, but sometimes it becomes a disadvantage. Several times laid out for new users 20-30 are very similar pictures, in which artistry can be found except that their author. To publish their fotonostre work and professional photographers. But recent attempts to troll have been seen there.
A couple of examples: from the user 'Volodya' in the user's 'Magellan', or by 'vvv' in the direction of Alexei Kiselyov. Explicit trolling fairly easy to spot: the negative will flow, even though what is depicted in the photo. Troll always find a flaw, but only in specific authors, others will praise. I recommend to simply ignore such commentators. But you can get a comment from a professional. The main thing to understand that he does not want you to hurt his criticism. Criticism – this is a sobering element to be useful, if you treat him right. Finish the article wishes to you more often laid out and commented on others' photos. Just do not lay out everything and show the audience something that you really tried hard. Enough for three photos a week to get enough reviews. As for the comments, I would like to see not only the 'beautiful', but at least 2-3 sentences in which it would be painted what you liked and what does not. Do not forget about loyalty. Should realize that you only write your opinion. Not the fact that you understand, for example, in the composition, better labels. You do not 'measure', you are a critic. Just respect their opinions. Your first comment I would like to see this article. ps the list of Internet resources on photography can read and fill in the appropriate forum thread: vkontakte.ru/topic-11432655_21584134 pps next article will be comparing the two cameras. Author Dergunov Alexander