IT IS NOT a BRANCH OF the RIGHT In this part of the work we will determine if the compared right is or not a branch of the right, which servir to study but thorough east subject, and of this form to include/understand the subject matter of study with slidos foundations, which harn possible a greater development of the jurdica discipline study matter. The compared right is not a branch of the right, nevertheless, exist other legal disciplines that if they are it as for example the case of civil right, constitutional, procedural civilian, procedural constitutionalist, penitentiary, procedural penitentiary, procedural constitutionalist, labor, labor, sanitary, medical, mercantile, club, record, exchange, record, stock-exchange office staff, procedural, telecommunications, communications, banking, financial, of bankruptcies, competing, among others. That is to say, all the branches of the right are legal disciplines but not all of these last ones of the type of first. 5. MAGNITUDE OF the RIGHT COMPARED In this subttulo we will study the magnitude of the compared right, which servir to know to that it leaves from the right applies and consequently we will be able to know what is the mbito of study of the same to be able to include/understand with major precisin its magnitude, since these subjects little have been treated in the right. The compared right is of such magnitude that includes to all the branches of the right and all the jurdicas disciplines, for that reason is clear that all must know it and apply it to have slidos knowledge on the same and of this form to be to da with ltimas new features of the right in the world, for example to be to da with the studied new features not slo in the Peruvian right but tambin studied in the American, Spanish right and francs, among others. That is to say, a right or quite ample jurdica discipline is, for example it can be realised comparisons from the civil right to the csmico and hdrico right, which must be matter of study on the part of the treaty writers.

The opaque, dirty and escabrosas interrelations that exist between the economy and the policy are more and more intense, and are many the tests that force to us to reflect about the present democratic mechanisms. How it is possible that people who have had their power as positions public happen, in hardly weeks, to being high positions in private companies? The pays that pay when leaving their political positions to them and the type of activity without another assignment that the one to grow or to mediate between borders thanks to the agendas acquired in the political life, force to pose many doubts on the honesty with which they have exerted his responsibilities in the State. They have guarded really by the public interest or, on the contrary, they have acted in agreement with his personal interests and the ones of his nearer surroundings? They would receive the same supplies if public had worked only by the interests? As he shows to the case of David Ivory palms, ex- director of the Economic Office of the President of the Spanish Government and who has stopped to happen to be president of SEOPAN, a group of interest formed by the main Spanish construction companies. But it would not have to be strange to anybody, have occurred an endless ones of similar cases lately: Tony Blair, Jos Maria Aznar, Schreder In the middle of the real estate crisis, Ivory palms took position in favor of which the government took part in the market of the house, going to the rescue of the real estate ones in hardships, and opposing again the Minister of Economy Who can think that is accidental? Quite the opposite. It is absolutely logical that the great companies that public live on favors, or their associations formed like interest groups, contract those people who during their respective political races have been to their service.